1955 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2005 Subaru Forester is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Forester weights approximately 164 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Riley RM A | 2005 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Riley | Subaru |
| Model | RM A | Forester |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |
