1956 AC Ace vs. 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 806 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
| Make | AC | De Tomaso |
| Model | Ace | Longchamp |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |
