1956 AC Ace vs. 1983 Audi 80
To start off, 1983 Audi 80 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Audi 80 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Audi 80 weights approximately 86 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm). This means 1956 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 1983 Audi 80 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Ace | 80 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 147 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 67 L |