1956 AC Ace vs. 2000 Chevrolet Prizm
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Prizm is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Prizm weights approximately 196 kg more than 1956 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Prizm (170 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Prizm will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Ace | 2000 Chevrolet Prizm | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Ace | Prizm |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 170 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 117 L |