1956 AC Ace vs. 2010 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2010 Lotus Evora is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Evora (400 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 326 more horse power than 1956 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Evora weights approximately 1097 kg more than 1956 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lotus Evora (459 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Ace | 2010 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | AC | Lotus |
| Model | Ace | Evora |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 459 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1991 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5098 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3063 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |
