1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1990 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Cadillac 6239D is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac 6239D. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Cadillac 6239D | 1990 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 6239D | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1956 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 100 L |