1956 Ford 12 M vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | 12 M | Elan |
Year Released | 1956 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2260 mm |