1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 45 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Isuzu Minx (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1956 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Isuzu Minx | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Subaru |
| Model | Minx | R2 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |
