1956 Riley RM A vs. 1973 Volvo 1800
To start off, 1973 Volvo 1800 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Volvo 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 45 kg more than 1973 Volvo 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Riley RM A | 1973 Volvo 1800 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | RM A | 1800 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2460 mm |