1956 Saab 92B vs. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 764 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Silverado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado has automatic transmission and 1956 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1956 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Saab 92B | 2010 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Saab | Chevrolet |
Model | 92B | Silverado |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Size | 763 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3650 mm |