1956 Saab 92B vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1181 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1956 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1956 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Saab 92B | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Saab | Mazda |
| Model | 92B | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 763 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2875 mm |
