1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 1966 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1966 Triumph 1300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 1300 (57 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 1300 should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 1300 (102 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 1966 Triumph 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Alpine A 106 | 1966 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Alpine | Triumph |
| Model | A 106 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 57 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 53 L |
