1957 Holden FE vs. 2002 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Armada is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1957 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1957 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Holden FE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Holden FE | 2002 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Holden | Mahindra |
Model | FE | Armada |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4310 mm |