1957 Seat 600 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 582 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Seat 600 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Seat | Toyota |
Model | 600 | Celica |
Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2440 mm |