1958 AC Ace vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Ace | TT |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
