1958 Alvis TC 108 G vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alvis TC 108 G would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Alvis TC 108 G weights approximately 170 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 1958 Alvis TC 108 G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alvis TC 108 G. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alvis TC 108 G.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alvis TC 108 G | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Alvis | Mini |
Model | TC 108 G | Roadster |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |