1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2001 Saturn SC is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire would be higher. At 3,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire (145 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Saturn SC. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire should accelerate faster than 2001 Saturn SC.
Because 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire | 2001 Saturn SC | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Saturn |
| Model | Star Sapphire | SC |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3990 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 125 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
