1958 Bristol 406 vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1958 Bristol 406 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,216 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Bristol 406 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 115 kg more than 1958 Bristol 406.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Bristol 406 | 1950 Riley RM A | |
Make | Bristol | Riley |
Model | 406 | RM A |
Year Released | 1958 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2870 mm |