1958 Bristol 406 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 406. (130 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 406.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Bristol 406. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 406. (180 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Bristol 406 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Bristol | Citroen |
| Model | 406 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2216 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.7 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.6 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
