1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Audi 4000
To start off, 1983 Audi 4000 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1983 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 4000.
Because 1983 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | 4000 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |