1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1986 Acura Integra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | 62 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
