1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (191 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 292 kg more than 2004 GMC Safari.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 GMC Safari | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | 62 | Safari |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 191 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1793 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |