1958 Jeep CJ vs. 2013 Subaru Legacy
To start off, 2013 Subaru Legacy is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Subaru Legacy (171 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Legacy should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Legacy weights approximately 378 kg more than 1958 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Subaru Legacy. (236 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Subaru Legacy.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Jeep CJ | 2013 Subaru Legacy | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ | Legacy |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1558 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1505 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2750 mm |