1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2009 Pontiac Solstice
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Solstice (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac Solstice weights approximately 779 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 2009 Pontiac Solstice | |
| Make | Lotus | Pontiac |
| Model | 16 | Solstice |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2420 mm |
