1959 Alpine A 106 vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1963 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Alpine A 106 | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Alpine | DKW |
| Model | A 106 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 31 L |
