1959 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1962 Dodge Polara is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 765 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Austin A 40 | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 40 | Polara |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2960 mm |
