1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1968 Skoda 1202 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1968 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | 62 | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 30 L |
