1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1976 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1976 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1425 kg more than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1976 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1976 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1976 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | 62 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 39 HP |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |
