1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1980 Zastava 750
To start off, 1980 Zastava 750 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1485 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1980 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 750 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2010 mm |
