1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 1983 Skoda L is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | 62 | L |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 38 L |
