1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1991 Ford Taurus is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1991 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1991 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1959 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2512 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |