1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Volvo V70
To start off, 1996 Volvo V70 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Volvo V70. (193 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 721 kg more than 1996 Volvo V70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1996 Volvo V70 has manual transmission. 1996 Volvo V70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | V70 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |