1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 1998 Acura EL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1998 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1998 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1998 Acura EL has manual transmission. 1998 Acura EL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | EL |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1704 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2619 mm |