1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1998 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura TL.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | TL |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2840 mm |