1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C (342 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | C |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 342 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |