1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |