1959 DAF 600 vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 DAF 600 | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | 600 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2360 mm |