1959 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Volkswagen Fusca
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Fusca is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Fusca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford 12 M (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Fusca. (52 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Fusca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 1996 Volkswagen Fusca | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | 12 M | Fusca |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1510 mm |