1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Studebaker | Volkswagen |
Model | Sky Hawk | Polo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4246 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2470 mm |