1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tazz (180 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tazz weights approximately 54 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1600 | Tazz |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1295 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |