1960 Austin 7 vs. 2001 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Ram (235 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2001 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | 7 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 235 HP |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 447 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1814 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 76 L |
