1960 Austin 7 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1159 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 7 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 83 L |