1960 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 965 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Epica |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 89.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 63 L |