1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1962 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1962 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 1962 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2290 mm |
