1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 323 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |