1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser. (129 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 81 L |