1960 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2003 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2003 Opel Meriva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air would be higher. At 3,869 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Meriva weights approximately 4 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air.
Because 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air | 2003 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Bel Air | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3869 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1376 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 53 L |
