1960 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler New Yorker weights approximately 310 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.
Because 1960 Chrysler New Yorker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chrysler New Yorker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler New Yorker | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | New Yorker | CL |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2580 mm |
