1960 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Audi TT
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi TT weights approximately 230 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 2002 Audi TT | |
| Make | DKW | Audi |
| Model | Munga | TT |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
