1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2000 Mazda Tribute is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 305 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 2000 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Falcon | 2000 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | Tribute |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |